- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-463/11: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Dectane v OHIM — Hella (DAYLINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0463
62011TB0463
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.2.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/23
(Case T-463/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 38/41
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Dectane GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by K. Klüpfel, then by K. Klüpfel and D. Botis, agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. (Lippstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Schnekenbühl, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011 (Case R 1231/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. and Dectane GmbH.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs of the defendant.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.
Language of the case: German