- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-146/24 P: Appeal brought on 23 February 2024 by Fugro NV against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2023 in Case T-143/23, Fugro v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0146
62024CN0146
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2737
29.4.2024
(Case C-146/24 P)
(C/2024/2737)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Fugro NV (represented by: T.C. Gerverdinck, advocaat)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order under appeal;
—to the extent that the Court considers the state of proceedings so permit, reject the plea of inadmissibility, declare the action admissible and refer the case back to the General Court to rule on the substance or, in the alternative, declare the contested measure (1) to be of individual concern to the appellant and refer the case back to the General Court to rule on direct concern or join it to the substance;
—order the Council to pay the costs, including the costs before the General Court.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant relies on one plea in law alleging that the General Court erred in law, in particular in paragraphs 40 to 44, by misinterpreting the concept of an ‘individual concern’ within the meaning of the second limb of Article 263(4) TFEU.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2737/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—