I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-752/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Customs union - Association Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Latvia - Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Reimbursement and remission of import duties - Import of woven linen fabrics from Latvia - Fairness clause - Special situation - Deception or obvious negligence - Commission decision finding that the remission of import duties was not justified))
(2017/C 283/44)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Combaro SA (Lausanne, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Ehle, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)
Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 4908 final of 16 July 2014 rejecting the applicant’s request for remission of import duties in the amount of EUR 461 415,62.
The General Court:
1.Annuls Commission Decision C(2014) 4908 final of 16 July 2014 rejecting Combaro SA’s request for remission of import duties in the amount of EUR 461 415,62;
2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Combaro.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017283EN.01003002-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017283EN.01003002-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.