- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-89/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — A v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 — Article 13 — Standstill clause — Family reunification of spouses — New restriction — Overriding reason in the public interest — Successful integration — Efficient management of migration flows — Proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0089
62018CA0089
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 305/13
(Case C-89/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Article 13 - Standstill clause - Family reunification of spouses - New restriction - Overriding reason in the public interest - Successful integration - Efficient management of migration flows - Proportionality)
(2019/C 305/16)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A
Defendant: Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet
Operative part of the judgment
Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed at Ankara on 12 September 1963 by the Republic of Turkey, on the one hand, and by the Member States of the EEC and the Community, on the other hand, and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963, must be interpreted as meaning that a national measure which makes family reunification between a Turkish worker legally resident in the Member State concerned and his spouse conditional upon their overall attachment to that Member State being greater than their overall attachment to a third country, constitutes a ‘new restriction’, within the meaning of that provision. Such a restriction is unjustified.
* Language of the case: Danish.
(2019/C 305/16)