- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-23/24: Action brought on 17 January 2024 — Instituto dos vinhos do Douro e do Porto v EUIPO — Vinoquel- Vinhos Oscar Quevedo (Quevedo Port)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0023
62024TN0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/1875
11.3.2024
(Case T-23/24)
(C/2024/1875)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Instituto dos vinhos do Douro e do Porto I. P. (Peso da Régua, Portugal) (represented by: P. Sousa e Silva, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vinoquel- Vinhos Oscar Quevedo Lda (São João da Pesqueira, Portugal)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Quevedo Port — Application for registration No 18 461 727
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 November 2023 in Case R 2471/2022-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the contested decision in order to reject the trade mark application at issue;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Office and the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 103(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to commercial use;
—Infringement of Article 103(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the exploitation of the reputation of a protected designation of origin;
—Infringement of Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the evocation of a protected designation of origin.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1875/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)