- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-96/21: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2021 — Amort and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA (nucleoside-modified) vaccine’ — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Non-regulatory act — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0096
62021TB0096
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/39
(Case T-96/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA (nucleoside-modified) vaccine’ - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - No individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 24/52)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Heidi Amort (Jenesien, Italy) and the 35 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killman and A. Sipos, as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of European Commission Implementing Decision C(2020) 9598 (final) of 21 December 2020, granting a conditional marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA (nucleoside-modified) vaccine’, a medicinal product for human use, as amended and supplemented.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by Roberta Riccio and Alessandra Rizzotto, by Gheorghe Piperea, by TN, by TF, TG, TH and TI, by Jean Gouezo and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by VV, by Stefano Del Gaudio and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by TO, TP and TQ, by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by Dieter Achtschin and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by VW, and by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH and Pfizer Inc.
3.Ms Heidi Amort and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex I are ordered to pay the costs.
4.Roberta Riccio and Alessandra Rizzotto, Gheorghe Piperea, TN, TF, TG, TH and TI, Jean Gouezo and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, VV, Stefano Del Gaudio and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, TO, TP and TQ, TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, Dieter Achtschin and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, VW and BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH and Pfizer Inc. shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 148, 26.4.21.