- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-383/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 April 2009 — New Europe v Commission of the European Communities (Formal inadmissibility of the application — Name of the applicant — Legal person governed by private law — Authority — Manifest inadmissibility — Intervention)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TB0383
62008TB0383
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
18.7.2009
C 167/11
(Case T-383/08)
(Formal inadmissibility of the application - Name of the applicant - Legal person governed by private law - Authority - Manifest inadmissibility - Intervention)
2009/C 167/23
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: New Europe (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A.-M. Alamanou, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission decision taken in the form of a letter of 2 July 2008 refusing to inform the applicant of the names of the companies and persons cited in the documents disclosed by the Commission relating to the ‘Eximo’ case,
Operative part of the order
1.The application is dismissed as being inadmissible.
2.The applicant shall bear its own costs.
3.There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Data Protection Supervisor.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 301 of 22.11.2008.