EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-442/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0442

62022TA0442

February 28, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2611

(Case T-442/22)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Institutional law - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Refusal to appoint one of the candidates nominated by [confidential] - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Confirmatory measure - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility - Causal link)

(C/2024/2611)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: PU (represented by: P. Yatagantzidis and D. Tsarapatsanis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis, F.-R. Radu and C. Charalambous, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action, the applicant seeks, first, under Article 263 TFEU, in essence, the annulment, in so far as they concern him, of Decision No 90/2021 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 8 [confidential] rejecting his candidacy and that of another candidate, A, for the positions of European Delegated Prosecutors in [confidential], Decision No 15/2022 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 23 [confidential] rejecting his and A’s complaint against the contested decision of 8 [confidential] and Decision No 21/2022 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 30 [confidential] appointing two European Delegated Prosecutors of [confidential] and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage he allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders PU to pay his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.

(1)

OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2611/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2611/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia