- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-193/25: Action brought on 20 March 2025 – IH and Others v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0193
62025TN0193
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2567
12.5.2025
(Case T-193/25)
(C/2025/2567)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: IH and five other applicants (represented by: L. Levi and M. Itani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;
—annul the decision set out in the applicants’ pay slips for June 2024 determining annual travel expenses based on the distance between their place of employment and their place of origin only as from 2024 and not also in respect of the years 2014 to 2023;
—in so far as is necessary, annul the decisions rejecting the complaints;
—order the defendant to reimburse the applicants’ annual travel expenses based on the distance between their place of employment and their place of origin in respect of the years 2014 to 2023, that amount to be increased by default interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-136/25, HV v EESC.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2567/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—