EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-446/20 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2020 by Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2020 in Case T-616/19, Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0446
62020CN0446
September 21, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 9/6
—
(Case C-446/20 P)
(2021/C 9/09)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, Rechtsanwältin)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium B.V.
By order of 12 November 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to pay its own costs.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.