I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-45/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Expiry of the international registration of the mark applied for - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 463/62)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: KRBL Ltd (Delhi, India) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Crawcour, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: P.K. Overseas Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 November 2019 (Case R 766/2019-4).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.KRBL Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear their own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
* * *
(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.