I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
29.4.2024
(Case T-259/22)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus - Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for wood products originating from Belarus - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Misuse of powers - Proportionality - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business)
(C/2024/2756)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: AAT Mostovdrev (Mosty, Belarus) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and A. Boggio-Tomasaz, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Carpus Carcea and J. Norris, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/356 of 2 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 67, p. 103), and second, of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/355 of 2 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 67, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders AAT Mostovdrev to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union;
3.Declares that the European Commission shall bear its own costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2756/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—