I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
17.6.2024
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Pherla - Earlier EU word mark VERLA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/3613)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Verla-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG (Tutzing, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Valeria Converso (San Giorgio a Cremano, Italy) (represented by F. Musella, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2023 (Case R 268/2022-2).
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2023 (Case R 268/2022-2);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Verla-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG;
4.Orders Ms Valeria Converso to bear her own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3613/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(1) OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15