- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-102/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Heli-Flight v EASA (Civil aviation — Application for approval of flight conditions for a Robinson R66 helicopter — Rejection decision of the EASA — Action for annulment — Scope of the Board of Appeal’s review — Scope of the Court’s review — Action for failure to act — Non-contractual liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0102
62013TA0102
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.2.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 46/46
(Case T-102/13)(1)
((Civil aviation - Application for approval of flight conditions for a Robinson R66 helicopter - Rejection decision of the EASA - Action for annulment - Scope of the Board of Appeal’s review - Scope of the Court’s review - Action for failure to act - Non-contractual liability))
(2015/C 046/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG (Reichelsheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Kittner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (represented by: T. Masing and C. Eckart, lawyers)
Re:
First, application for annulment of the decision of the EASA of 13 January 2012 rejecting the applicant’s application for approval of flight conditions submitted for a Robinson R66 helicopter (serial number 0034); secondly, application for a declaration that the EASA failed to act concerning the processing of the applicant’s applications of 11 July 2011 and 10 January 2012 concerning that helicopter and, thirdly, claim that the EASA should make good the damage that the applicant considers it has suffered because of that rejection decision and that alleged failure to act.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.