- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-691/16: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Elevolution — Engenharia v Commission (EDF — Support programme for development in Mauritania — Contract for services entered into with Mauritania in the context of the implementation of that programme — Withdrawal of contested debit notes — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0691
62016TB0691
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 256/28
(Case T-691/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EDF - Support programme for development in Mauritania - Contract for services entered into with Mauritania in the context of the implementation of that programme - Withdrawal of contested debit notes - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 256/34)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Elevolution — Engenharia SA (Amadora, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pinto Cardoso and L. Fuzeta da Ponte, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and M. França, Agents)
Subject matter
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the ‘decisions’ allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter and the three debit notes of 26 July 2016 concerning the repayment of various amounts with regard to a contract for services between the applicant and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present case.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Elevolution — Engenharia SA.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.