- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-352/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – CeramicSpeed Sport v EUIPO – Golec (OSPW System) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark OSPW System – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0352
62024TA0352
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4045
28.7.2025
(Case T-352/24)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark OSPW System - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/4045)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: CeramicSpeed Sport A/S (Holstebro, Denmark) (represented by: K. Kvistgaard-Aaholm, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Marcin Golec (London, United Kingdom) (represented by K. Muraro, G. Russo and C. Comolli Acquaviva, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 May 2024 (Case R 1782/2023-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders CeramicSpeed Sport A/S, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Mr Marcin Golec;
3.Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is to bear its own costs.
—
OJ C, C/2024/5118, 26.8.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4045/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—