- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-86/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 December 2008 — Deichmann-Schuhe v OHIM — Design for Woman (DEITECH) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a figurative Community trade mark DEITECH — Earlier national and international figurative trade marks DEI-tex — Relative grounds for refusal — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0086
62007TA0086
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/30
(Case T-86/07)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative Community trade mark DEITECH - Earlier national and international figurative trade marks DEI-tex - Relative grounds for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2009/C 32/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH & Co. KG (Essen, Germany) (initially represented by O. Rauscher, lawyer, then by O. Rauscher and A. Schulz, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Design for Woman SA (Bogotá, Colombia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2007 (case number R 791/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH & Co. KG and Design for Woman SA.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Partially annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 January 2007 (case number R 791/2006-2) in so far as it finds that genuine use of the earlier marks has not been proven in respect of ‘shoes’ in Class 25 covered by the application for a Community trade mark;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.