EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-45/24, Verein für Konsumenteninformation: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 January 2024 – Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0045

62024CN0045

January 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2730

29.4.2024

(Case C-45/24, Verein für Konsumenteninformation)

(C/2024/2730)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Questions referred

1.Is Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) and in particular Article 8(1)(a) thereof to be interpreted as meaning that the price of the ticket to be taken into consideration for the purpose of determining the reimbursement owed by the air carrier to a passenger in the event of cancellation of a flight also includes the difference between the amount paid by the passenger and the amount received by the air carrier, which corresponds to a commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between those two parties, if the air carrier, although aware that the other person regularly charges a commission (arrangement fee) for an intermediary service, does not know the amount of that commission in the specific case?

2.Does the burden of proving that the air carrier had the necessary knowledge lie with the passenger seeking reimbursement, or is it for the air carrier to prove that it lacked the necessary knowledge of the commission?

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2730/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: German.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia