- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-18/24: Action brought on 10 January 2024 — US v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0018
62024TN0018
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/2048
(Case T-18/24)
(C/2024/2048)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: US (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Forms of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—admit the present action as procedurally valid and declare it to be well founded and substantiated;
—consequently, annul the contested inadmissibility decision and the contested report, or otherwise declare them null and void;
—award the applicant the sum of EUR 50 884,71 by way of compensation for material damage and the sum of EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action seeking the annulment of his staff report for the 2022 appraisal exercise, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging an error of fact.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2048/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)