I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-815/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Financial assistance - Project of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Preliminary planning services for the new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line - Decision on eligible costs - Incorrect identification of the defendant - Not directly affected - Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 427/102)
Language of the case: Czech
Applicant: Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: F. Korbel, lawyer)
Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and Z.Malůšková, acting as Agents), Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo and I. Barcew, acting as Agents)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of INEA’s letter of 11 October 2017 relating to the final financial statement of the eligibility of the sums claimed from the EU financial assistance granted to the project of common interest ‘Services relating to the preliminary planning of a new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line’.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland.
3.Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).
4.Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, the Commission, INEA, the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland shall each bear their own costs connected with the applications for leave to intervene.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2018427EN.01007601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018427EN.01007601-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.