I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 215/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Apologistics GmbH (Markkleeberg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hug, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Markus Kerckhoff (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark APO — European Union trade mark No 9 273 103
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2020 in Case R 982/2019-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation EU No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation EU No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.