- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-157/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LICHTYOGA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0157
62020TN0157
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.6.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/22
(Case T-157/20)
(2020/C 191/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Gabriele Bachmann (Bad Grönenbach, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA — Application for registration No 18 054 208
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2019 in Case R 2317/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—uphold the appeal;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.