- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2012. # Erika Šujetová v Rapid life životná poisťovňa, a.s.. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Krajský súd v Prešove - Slovakia. # Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate. # Case C-252/11.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:653
62011CO0252
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Case pending before the national court rendered devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 13-15)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Provision of national law under which exclusive jurisdiction in relation to an application for annulment of an arbitral award is attributed to the court in whose area of jurisdiction the arbitration proceedings took place — Provision of national law under which that court is under an obligation, upon annulling an arbitral award, to continue the main proceedings without re-examining its territorial jurisdiction — Unfair arbitration agreement or arbitration clause.
Operative part
It is not necessary to give a ruling on the reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia), by decision of 7 April 2011 in Case C-252/11.