- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-105/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 — Poland v European Commission (Appeal — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Rural Development — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Article 33b — Support for semi-subsistence farms undergoing restructuring — Obligation to spend at least 50 % of the support on restructuring operations)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0105
62016CA0105
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/13
(Case C-105/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - EAGGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Rural Development - Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 - Article 33b - Support for semi-subsistence farms undergoing restructuring - Obligation to spend at least 50 % of the support on restructuring operations))
(2017/C 144/17)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017144EN.01001301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017144EN.01001301-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.