EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-26/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 – Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe v European Commission (Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe citizens’ initiative – European Commission Communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in that citizens’ initiative – Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0026

62023CA0026

June 5, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4014

28.7.2025

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 – Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ v European Commission

(Case C-26/23 P)

(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - ‘Minority SafePack - one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ citizens’ initiative - European Commission Communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in that citizens’ initiative - Obligation to state reasons)

(C/2025/4014)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (represented by: T. Hieber, Rechtsanwalt)

supported by:

Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft Belgiens (represented by: S. Gröss, Rechtsanwalt), Autonome Provinz Bozen Südtirol – Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano Alto Adige (represented by: J.A. Walther von Herbstenburg, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene, E.A. Stamate, C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents), Hellenic Republic, Slovak Republic

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Dismisses the appeal;

Orders the Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs;

Orders the Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft Belgiens (German-speaking Community of Belgium) and the Autonome Provinz Bozen Südtirol – Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano Alto Adige (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol / Alto Adige) to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 83, 6.3.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4014/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia