I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - ‘Minority SafePack - one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ citizens’ initiative - European Commission Communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in that citizens’ initiative - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/4014)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (represented by: T. Hieber, Rechtsanwalt)
supported by:
Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft Belgiens (represented by: S. Gröss, Rechtsanwalt), Autonome Provinz Bozen Südtirol – Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano Alto Adige (represented by: J.A. Walther von Herbstenburg, avvocato)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene, E.A. Stamate, C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents), Hellenic Republic, Slovak Republic
The Court:
Dismisses the appeal;
Orders the Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
Orders Hungary to bear its own costs;
Orders the Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft Belgiens (German-speaking Community of Belgium) and the Autonome Provinz Bozen Südtirol – Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano Alto Adige (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol / Alto Adige) to bear their own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 83, 6.3.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4014/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—