I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2012) - Aid supporting renewable electricity and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users - Decision declaring the aid partially incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - Advantage - State resources - Public control of resources - Measure which can be assimilated to a levy on electricity consumption)
(2019/C 187/03)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by T. Henze and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents, and by T. Lübbig, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by K. Herrmann and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission (T-47/15, EU:T:2016:281);
2.Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 in State aid proceedings SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) [implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and energy-intensive users];
3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to both the appeal proceedings and the proceedings at first instance.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019187EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019187EN.01000301-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.