- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-25/17: Action brought on 17 January 2017 — Rintisch v EUIPO — Compagnie laitière européenne (PROTICURD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0025
62017TN0025
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/44
(Case T-25/17)
(2017/C 063/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Bernhard Rintisch (Bottrop, Germany) (represented by: A. Dreyer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Compagnie laitière européenne SA (Condé Sur Vire, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union No 981 041 in respect of the word mark ‘PROTICURD’
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2016 in Case R 247/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.