EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-323/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 5 July 2010 — Gebr. Stolle GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0323
62010CN0323
July 5, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.10.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 274/5
(Case C-323/10)
()
2010/C 274/06
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Gebr. Stolle GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
Question referred
Does a carcase in subheading 0207 12 90 (1) have to be completely drawn (= without residue), so that it is detrimental for tariff classification purposes if, after going through a mechanical gutting process, a carcase is still left, for example, with part of the guts or trachea?
(1) OJ 1999 L 338, p. 1.
* * *
Language of the case: German
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.