EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-585/23: Action brought on 15 September 2023 — Mylan Ireland v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0585

62023TN0585

September 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/772

(Case T-585/23)

(C/2023/772)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mylan Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the applicant’s request for annulment admissible and well-founded;

annul the European Commission’s implied negative decision of 8 July 2023 refusing the access to the requested documents, as confirmed by the out of time explicit negative decision of 11 August 2023;

order the European Commission to grant access to the requested documents immediately; and

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the European Commission breached Articles 2 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) by not providing access to the requested documents.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the explicit negative decision provided out of time does not change the situation and is in any event in breach of Article 4(2) and 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the European Commission breached Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 by not providing partial access to the identified documents.

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/772/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia