EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-102/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Despatch of the applicant’s personal effects — Action for damages — Action manifestly inadmissible — Action manifestly unfounded in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008FB0102

62008FB0102

March 25, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/53

(Case F-102/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Staff cases - Officials - Despatch of the applicant’s personal effects - Action for damages - Action manifestly inadmissible - Action manifestly unfounded in law - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

2010/C 148/94

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request for, first, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a result of the despatch of his personal effects from his official lodgings in Luanda and, second, the provision of copies of the photographs taken in the course of that despatch and the destruction of all documents relating to those effects.

Operative part of the order

1.Mr Marcuccio’s application is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded in law.

2.Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.

3.Mr Marcuccio is ordered to reimburse to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 1 500.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 55, 7.3.2009, p. 52.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia