- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-503/21: Order of the General Court of 14 February 2022 — Lagardére, unité médico-sociale v Commission (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate — Freedom of movement for persons — Restrictions — Incorrect designation of the defendant — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0503
62021TB0503
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.4.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/39
(Case T-503/21) (*)
(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate - Freedom of movement for persons - Restrictions - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 171/52)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Lagardère, unité médico-sociale (Ghlin, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vanlangendonck, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti, agent)
Re:
By its action, expressly directed against the European Commission and based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ 2021 L 211, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
3.Lagardère, unité médico-sociale, shall pay the costs.
4.The Parliament and the Council are to bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.