EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-350/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings initiated by the Spetsializirana prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector — Confidentiality of communications — Providers of electronic communications services — General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data for a period of six months — Combating serious crime — Access to the retained data — Informing the data subjects — Right to a remedy — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) and (2) — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Articles 13 and 54 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8, 11 and 47 and Article 52(1))

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0350

62021CA0350

November 17, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/16

(Case C-350/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector - Confidentiality of communications - Providers of electronic communications services - General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data for a period of six months - Combating serious crime - Access to the retained data - Informing the data subjects - Right to a remedy - Directive 2002/58/EC - Article 15(1) and (2) - Directive (EU) 2016/680 - Articles 13 and 54 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 7, 8, 11 and 47 and Article 52(1))

(2023/C 15/16)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Party in the main proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

must be interpreted as precluding (i) national legislation that provides, by way of prevention, for the purpose of combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security, for general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data, even if that legislation limits that general and indiscriminate retention to a period of six months and provides for a certain number of safeguards as regards retention of and access to the data in question; and (ii) national legislation that does not provide, in a clear and precise manner, that the access to the retained data is limited to what is strictly necessary for achieving the objective pursued by that retention.

2.Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, as amended by Directive 2009/136, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and Articles 13 and 54 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data,

must be interpreted as precluding national legislation that provides for access, on the part of the national authorities competent to undertake criminal investigations, to lawfully retained traffic and location data, without guaranteeing that the persons whose data have been accessed by those national authorities are informed thereof to the extent provided for under EU law, and without those persons having any remedy against unlawful access to those data.

Language of the case: Bulgarian

* * *

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia