EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-661/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Securitec v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s offer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications — Equal treatment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0661

62018TA0661

July 8, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.10.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/12

(Case T-661/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s offer - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications - Equal treatment)

(2020/C 339/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Securitec (Livange, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Peuvrel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Ilkova, A Katsimerou and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision of 7 September 2018 to reject the tender submitted by the applicant for lot No. 4 of the contract which was the subject of the restricted tender procedure HR/R1/PR/2017/059 and relating to the ‘maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg’, and second, of the Commission’s decision of 17 September 2018 to refuse to provide the applicant with the clarifications that it had requested in the context of that procedure on 11 September 2018

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 7 September 2018 to reject the tender submitted by Securitec for lot no. 4 of the contract that was the subject of restricted tender procedure HR/R1/PR/2017/059 relating to the ‘maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg’ and the decision of the Commission of 17 September 2018 to refuse to provide Securitec with the clarifications that it had requested in the context of that procedure on 11 September 2018;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia