- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-640/16 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2017 — Greenpeace Energy eG v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Action for annulment — Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility — Aid planned by the United Kingdom in favour of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Locus standi — Appellant not individually concerned)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CB0640
62016CB0640
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.12.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/16
(Case C-640/16 P)(*1)
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Action for annulment - Article 263 TFEU - Admissibility - Aid planned by the United Kingdom in favour of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Locus standi - Appellant not individually concerned))
(2017/C 424/22)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Greenpeace Energy eG (represented by: D. Fouquet, J. Nysten and S. Michaels, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck-Putz, P. Němečková and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the Commission: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: D. Robertson, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Greenpeace Energy eG shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(*1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.