- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-60/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Ruiz Molina v OHIM (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — OHIM staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the member of staff is not included on a reserve list of a competition — Termination of the contract pursuant to the termination clause — Date on which the termination clause takes effect — Open Competition OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FA0060
62015FA0060
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.4.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 136/47
(Case F-60/15) (1)
((Civil service - Member of the temporary staff - OHIM staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause - Clause terminating the contract in the event that the member of staff is not included on a reserve list of a competition - Termination of the contract pursuant to the termination clause - Date on which the termination clause takes effect - Open Competition OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13))
(2016/C 136/67)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: José Luis Ruiz Molina (San Juan de Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer, then N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially, B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, then A. Lukošiūtė, Agent, and B. Wägenbauer, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the President of OHIM of 4 June 2014 terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff, seeking reinstatement by OHIM, if possible, and, if not, fair financial compensation for the alleged unlawful termination of his contract, and finally for damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Declares that Mr Ruiz Molina is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);
3.Declares that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is to bear half of its own costs.
(1) OJ C 213, 29/6/2015, p. 48.