- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-239/22: Action brought on 29 April 2022 — Cherusci v EUIPO — LexDellmeier (RIALTO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0239
62022TN0239
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/75
(Case T-239/22)
(2022/C 237/95)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Cherusci Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LexDellmeier Intellectual Property Law Firm (Munich, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark RIALTO — EU trade mark No 11 706 546
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2022 in Case R 695/2021-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.