- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-352/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 28 May 2021 — A1 and A2 v I
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0352
62021CN0352
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.8.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/31
(Case C-352/21)
(2021/C 320/32)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: A1 and A2
Respondents: I
Question referred
Must Article 15(5) of the Brussels I Regulation, (1) in conjunction with Article 16(5) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that hull insurance for pleasure craft that are not used for commercial purposes falls within the exception laid down in Article 16(5) of that regulation, and is, therefore, an insurance contract which contains a choice of court agreement departing from the rule laid down in Article 11 of that regulation valid under Article 15(5) of that regulation?
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).