I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 372/27
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Corent d’Elzius, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;
—consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, to the extent that they concern the applicant;
—order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law that are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council (1).
(1) OJ C 290, p. 13.