- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-104/12: Action brought on 1 March 2012 — Verus v OHIM — Performance Industries Manufacturing (VORTEX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0104
62012TN0104
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 157/7
(Case T-104/12)
2012/C 157/11
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Verus Eood (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: S. Vykydal, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Performance Industries Manufacturing, Inc. (Odessa, Florida, United States)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 21 December 2011 in Case R 512/2011-4, VORTEX/VORTEX, and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Performance Industries Manufacturing Inc.
Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘VORTEX’ for goods in Classes 7 and 12 (Registration No 5 375 324).
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘VORTEX’, registered for services in Classes 35 and 39 (mark No 5 514 104).
Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009, as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.