- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-7/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 9 January 2008 — Har Vaessen Douane Service B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0007
62008CN0007
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.4.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 92/11
(Case C-7/08)
(2008/C 92/18)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Questions referred
1.Is Article 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3357/91 of 7 November 1991, to be interpreted as meaning that the relief referred to in that Article may be claimed in respect of consignments made up of goods which are individually of negligible value but are dispatched as a grouped consignment with a combined intrinsic value which exceeds the value threshold in Article 27?
2.Should Article 27 of the regulation referred to be applied on the basis that ‘dispatched direct from a third country to a consignee in the Community’ also covers a situation in which the goods are in a third country before being dispatched to the consignee but the consignee's contractual partner is established in the Community?
Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (OJ 1983 L 105, p. 1).
OJ 1991 L 318, p. 3.