- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-7/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 — Faria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Staff cases — Officials — Reports — Evaluation report — 2006/2007 evaluation period — Application for annulment of the evaluation report — Manifest error of assessment — Compensation for non-material damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FA0007
62009FA0007
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/51
(Case F-7/09)(1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Reports - Evaluation report - 2006/2007 evaluation period - Application for annulment of the evaluation report - Manifest error of assessment - Compensation for non-material damage)
2010/C 134/84
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Marie-Hélène Faria (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the evaluation report in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007, and an order that the defendant pay compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls Ms Faria's evaluation report, drawn up by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007;
2.For the rest, dismisses the action;
3.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of Ms Faria's costs;
4.Orders Ms Faria to bear one quarter of her own costs.
(1) OJ C 69 of 21.03.2009, p. 55.