I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-371/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Market for baseband chipsets used in consumer electronic devices - Administrative procedure - Article 18(3) and Article 24(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Decision requesting information - Obligation to state reasons - Necessity of the information requested - Proportionality - Burden of proof - Privilege against self-incrimination - Principle of good administration)
(2019/C 187/76)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Qualcomm, Inc (San Diego, California, United States), Qualcomm Europe, Inc., (Sacramento, California, United States) (represented by: M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato and M. Davilla, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, G. Conte, M. Farley and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 2258 final of 31 March 2017 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 18(3) and to Article 24(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case AT.39711 — Qualcomm (predation))
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019187EN.01007201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019187EN.01007201-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.