EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-427/21, ALB FILS KLINIKEN: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — LD v ALB FILS Kliniken GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Temporary agency work — Directive 2008/104/EC — Article 1 — Scope — Definition of ‘temporary assignment’ — Transfer of duties performed by a worker, from the latter’s employer to a third-party undertaking — Permanent assignment of that worker while maintaining the latter’s initial contract of employment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0427

62021CA0427

June 22, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/3

(Case C-427/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) ALB FILS KLINIKEN)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Temporary agency work - Directive 2008/104/EC - Article 1 - Scope - Definition of ‘temporary assignment’ - Transfer of duties performed by a worker, from the latter’s employer to a third-party undertaking - Permanent assignment of that worker while maintaining the latter’s initial contract of employment)

(2023/C 278/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LD

Defendant: ALB FILS Kliniken GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(b) to (e) thereof,

must be interpreted as meaning that that directive does not apply to a situation in which, first, the duties performed by a worker are transferred definitively by his or her employer to a third-party undertaking and, second, that worker, whose employment relationship with that employer is maintained on account of the fact that that worker has exercised his or her right to object to the transfer of that employment relationship to that third-party undertaking, may be required, at the request of that employer, to perform, on a permanent basis, the work contractually due for that third-party undertaking and, in that context, be subject to the technical and organisational direction of the latter.

Language of the case: German.

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia