14.2.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/65

(Case T-805/21)

(2022/C 73/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: NS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action admissible and well-founded;

—annul the decision of 21 January 2021 reassigning the applicant to the post of Adviser in the Directorate-General for the Presidency and, to the extent necessary, the decision of 8 March 2021 to recover the overpayment;

—in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 16 September 2021 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 7 April 2021;

—make good the applicant’s material and non-material damage;

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in particular breach of the right to be heard and breach of the obligation to give reasons.

2.Second plea in law, alleging manifest lack of interest of the service and breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

3.Third plea in law, alleging misuse of power and abuse of process.