- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-303/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Wam Industriale v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Execution of a judgment of the General Court — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Duty to exercise diligence — Duty of care)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0303
62010TA0303
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.11.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 355/25
(Case T-303/10)(1)
(State aid - Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries - Reduced rate loans - Decision declaring aid in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure - Execution of a judgment of the General Court - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Duty to exercise diligence - Duty of care)
2012/C 355/53
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Wam Industriale SpA (Modena, Italy) (represented by: G. M. Roberti and I. Perego, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/134/EU of 24 March 2010 concerning State aid C 4/03 (ex NN 102/02) implemented by Italy for Wam SpA (OJ 2011 L 57, p. 29).
Operative part of the judgment
1.The action is dismissed;
2.Wam Industriale SpA is ordered to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.