- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-144/24: Action brought on 8 March 2024 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0144
62024TN0144
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2787
29.4.2024
(Case T-144/24)
(C/2024/2787)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen BV (Hoogeveen, Netherlands) (represented by: H. Roerdink, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sören Pürschel (Frankfurt, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BIENENBEISSER – European Union trade mark No 8 714 834
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2024 in Case R 793/2023-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—partially annul the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue was partially revoked for goods in Class 19;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 58(l)(a) read together with Article 33(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2787/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—