EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-612/22 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2022 by Tigercat International Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2022 in Case T-251/21, Tigercat International Inc. v EUIPO
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0612
62022CN0612
September 23, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/24
—
(Case C-612/22 P)
(2023/C 24/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Tigercat International Inc. (represented by: B. Führmeyer, Rechtsanwalt, E. B. Matthes, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Caterpillar Inc.
By order of 05 December 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tigercat International Inc. should bear its own costs.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.