- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-812/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels — Rejection of the applicants’ tender and award of the contract to another tenderer — Withdrawal of the contested act — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0812(01)
62017TB0812(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-812/17) (*1)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Seco Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) and Vinçotte (Vilvoorde, Belgium) (represented by: A. Delvaux and R. Simar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by P. López-Carceller and Z. Nagy, and subsequently by Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action based on Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the applicants’ tender in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
* * *
(*1) OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.