I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
11.3.2024
(C/2024/1884)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: P. Matyjek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gap (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘gappol’ — EU trade mark No 15 218 092
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2023 in Case R 634/2023-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decisions at first and second instance in their entirety and discontinue the proceedings; or alternatively:
—amend the contested decision by annulling the contested decision at first and second instance and dismissing the GAP application in its entirety; or alternatively:
—annul the contested decision at first and second instance and refer the case back to EUIPO for a fresh decision at first instance;
—irrespective of the decision on the merits, order GAP to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of legal representation, to Marzena Porczyńska.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001;
—Infringement of Articles 61(1), 61(3), 109(1) and 120(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001;
—Infringement of Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 19(2) Regulation 2018/625.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1884/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)