- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-588/11 P: Order of the Court of 18 September 2012 — Omnicare Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Astellas Pharma GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the word sign ‘OMNICARE’ — Opposition — Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting the application — Action — Judgment of the General Court dismissing that action — Withdrawal of the opposition — Appeal — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CB0588
62011CB0588
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 379/12
(Case C-588/11 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2012379EN.01001202-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2012379EN.01001202-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the word sign ‘OMNICARE’ - Opposition - Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting the application - Action - Judgment of the General Court dismissing that action - Withdrawal of the opposition - Appeal - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 379/20
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Omnicare Inc. (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Astellas Pharma GmbH (represented by: M.L. Polo Carreño, abogada)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-290/09 Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE) in which the General Court dismissed an action, brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in Class 42, for the annulment of Decision R 402/2008-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 14 May 2009 annulling the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the opposition brought by the proprietor of the national mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in Classes 35, 41 and 42 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Notion of genuine use of an earlier mark — Mark used for services provided free of charge
Operative part of the order
3. Omnicare Inc. and Astellas Pharma GmbH shall each bear their own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2012379EN.01001202-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2012379EN.01001202-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 25, 28.1.2012).